Corpus boundary — Montaigne v1
Fixed before extraction. Full sourcing detail (line ranges, word counts,
translator rationale): sources/SOURCE_MANIFEST.md.
Included
Essays of Michel de Montaigne, tr. Charles Cotton, ed. W.C. Hazlitt
(1877), Project Gutenberg #3600 — PROOF WORK. Eleven central essays plus the
author's preface, ~141k words:
- «К читателю» (Au lecteur; Hazlitt's rendering in the same PD volume,
marked "Omitted by Cotton" — supplied by the editor) - I.8 Of Idleness — рождение метода essai
- I.19 That to Study Philosophy is to Learn to Die
- I.22 Of Custom, and that we should not easily change a law received
- I.25 Of the Education of Children
- I.30 Of Cannibals
- I.38 Of Solitude
- II.1 Of the Inconstancy of our Actions
- II.12 Apology for Raimond Sebond — bounded slice, 3 segments
(presumption/cat; plague-of-wisdom; the skeptical core from the taxonomy of
philosophies through «Que sais-je?», senses, flux, to the chapter's close) - II.17 Of Presumption
- III.2 Of Repentance
- III.13 Of Experience
Chapter numbers follow Cotton/Hazlitt (modern French editions shift Book I
numbers by one: Of Cannibals = I.31 there).
Included separately, marked
- French arbiter passages (
sources/fr_arbiter_passages.txt): 1595/1907
French for «Que sais-je?», «branloire perenne» / «je ne peinds pas
l'estre», «Au lecteur». Reference-only, NOT part of the verbatim gate.
Excluded
- The ~90 remaining essays, including famous ones (Of Friendship, Of Books,
Of Vanity, Of Physiognomy, Of Cruelty II.11, On some verses of Virgil) —
quotes from them may NOT appear in the KB. In particular «смерть — конец,
но не цель жизни» (III.12) is outside the corpus. - The Apology outside the three segments (the fideist defense of Sebond, the
long natural-history catalogue, the astronomy survey between segments). - Travel Journal, letters, the Ephemeris marginalia.
- Modern translations (Frame, Screech, Бобович) — not PD; reference-only at
most, never evidence. - Internet quote collections; «Монтень сказал…» без указания эссе.
Editorial-strata caveat
Montaigne wrote in layers (A: 1580, B: 1588, C: 1595 marginalia). The Cotton
text is the 1595 composite; the corpus does NOT encode the strata, so this KB
must not claim «ранний/поздний Монтень» from within a single essay. Where the
KB speaks of drift (I.19 → III.13 on death), it relies on Book I vs Book III
composition dates, which is safe at essay granularity.
Reason
The Essays are huge (107 chapters, ~500k words); a bounded, coherent set of
the central self-portrait + skepticism + ethics essays keeps the evidence
pool auditable while covering every concept the debates need. The Apology is
sliced because its skeptical core is load-bearing for the debate persona
while the fideist catalogue sections are not; the slice boundaries are stated
line-exactly in the manifest, so the gate stays deterministic.